#AUDIOFINDER CONVERT MAC AAF FOR MAC#SM has gobs of useless fields and you can't tell which column it'll put your datum on, but at least you can search the metadata without knowing beforehand which column it did put your datum on.Perfect Solutions to Uninstall AudioFinder 5.9.14 for Mac This becomes an issue because there's no "search all fields" box in Basehead, so if you want to do a search for a particular artist or album name, you have to guess which filed it's putting that in, which don't seem to have consistent application. #AUDIOFINDER CONVERT MAC AAF MP4#None of my Quicktime standard MP4 metadata is indexed, which is a shame. My name, which appears in the ID3 chunk of a particular wave file as the "lead artist" (id3 v2.4 frame ID "TPE1"), is shown as the "Library" in Base's display. The problem is none of my files have a "category," I have no idea how it's coming up with this column - it seems to read id3 metadata, and BWAV chunks, and then it just maps this information to its own list of fields (most of the time the "Category" seems to be the enclosing folder name). I always thought its metadata presentation was sorta dodgy, for instance nowadays it gives a "category" for every sound you might click on. i'm currently looking for an enhanced audio browser to quicken my workflowIt now plays apple lossless, which it didn't always. Hey dudes how good is basehead now? i always wanted to something like it, never knew this existed. Maybe it'll push the Soundminer folks in to putting out a demo version as well. You might want to check with them if iXML support is already there or coming. I spied a processing section in the v3 teaser video. The VST rack is nice, but it doesn't blow my skirt up like it used to.ītw, it looks like that's coming to Basehead 3. Also, I can preview media in the Reaper bins through any track, and thus any effects, and rendering a version is a keypress away. Basehead has been a little more preemptive in that particular area. Reapers v4 alpha cycle has been quite interesting in the past weeks as it now has multiple bins(called bays there), and since Basehead can spot to track on Reaper, I may switch to BH at some point if I work more and more on it. I'm certainly willing to support them with $30 for providing such an excellent customer service, because that is what it has been. $30 for one year of support is easy to afford, and we all cherish their lightning fast support now, don't we. The rest of the options for Soundminer are as fair as they've ever been. #AUDIOFINDER CONVERT MAC AAF WINDOWS#Soundminer even separates Windows and Mac licenses, which I find to be an incentive to think about a purchase just a little more. My needs are being met quite well so far with Soundminer XP.īasehead has a real big advantage with one fact. #AUDIOFINDER CONVERT MAC AAF PC#I'm probably crossgrading to SD HD Plus from my Soundminer XP verison, since I use a PC when dialog and fx editing on my own setup. If you consider lower price an advantage the answer is: Maybe You have to ask yourself what you need and base your decision on that. Also MS-monitoring and spotting is great too. I need iXML support for dialog editing and I need multi-channel auditioning. If you compare features SM wins hands down. Question remaining: Is this relevant for you? If you sum up what SM does and what BH does not you will find that SM can do more. Some people are fine with BH´s features some not. If the features were equal nobody would buy SM. There´s always a reason why certain things are cheaper than others. Unless you don´t need the features that SM has over BH. Sorry should perhaps have been more to the point.Īre there advantages to choosing BH over SM other than price and GUI at this time?Other than the price, not really. Because it has been a PC only app until now, the Mac-centric post biz on the West coast of the USA would not have run into it much, but it is used a lot in areas where PCs are more common. It was mentioned that some users didn't know anyone using Basehead. If you are going to use a SFX pgm a lot and have a big library (like 20k+ sounds) I sort of feel like the price diffs are trivial-you should get what works best with whatever app you drive every day. Their full-up version is more expensive than the low-end SM, but less than the full-up SM. Basehead (as of v3) now has a Mac version, and can spot to PT and Nuendo and Avid etc. Some of you SM power users would have to tell me if the Windows and the Mac versions now have the same features, esp the higher-level ones mentioned a few posts back. #AUDIOFINDER CONVERT MAC AAF FULL#The full up SM for Windows in up around $400 (what they call "HD versions"), and the "Cadillac" v4 for Mac is still around $900 (not incl the ripping app). SM now has Windows versions starting $200 for fewer features than the full up SM (but their ripper app is Mac only).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |